Saturday, March 31, 2018

Redeeming Cameroon from the hands of the Fascist Regime in Power and from Hooliganism


We failed to prevent the armed conflict seething in Cameroon today, in  Anglophone Cameroon or what was British Southern Cameroons in colonial times, or West Cameroon during the early years of Cameroon’s history as an “independent” country. We the  Kamerunists, otherwise called the union-nationalists of Cameroon(heirs of the historic UPC  and KNDP/OK that fought for and realized Cameroon’s  independence and reunification through the 1961 plebiscite), failed in our civic-nationalist struggle to kick the French-imposed system of looters and mercenaries ( kleptomaniac fascists per se) out of power  in time to realize the century-old dream of “THE NEW CAMEROON”, and in time to undercut  the heirs of those who were against reunification from saying that  “Look, reunification was a bad idea.”

The truth is that the current government, the Biya regime and the system or political establishment as a whole never cherished the civic-nationalist goals of reunification and independence that the overwhelming majority of our forebears fought and died for, as well as campaigned and voted for in the 1961 plebiscite. That is why the French-imposed system pushed  Anglophone Cameroon to the wall, thereby giving the heirs of those who voted against reunification the upper hand to stand as the champion of the cause for the rights of the peoples of Anglophone Cameroon (the former West Cameroon or the former British Southern Cameroons before that).

Today, these two  forces (the government/establishment/French-imposed system and the separatists/secessionists) that  have always been a minority in Cameroon’s traumatic history are fighting each other, giving each other relevance---one , falsely as the force trying to keep Cameroon together, while the other  sadly as  the force to take Anglophone Cameroon away to a future  that  in reality is Impossible.  Meanwhile, the overwhelming majority of Cameroonians who decry their activities are helpless as they drag Cameroon into the abyss, making each other relevant in a fight  that  the powers that be wish for Cameroon and Cameroonians, a people who defied the stereotypes about Africans as a heavily-divided race incapable of tapping into their mutually compatible strengths and opportunities, so as to come together and become a powerful, united, free, prosperous and defensible force. The powers that be would like to say about the peoples of Cameroon: “Look, they are not any different from other Africans. They too are self-destructive; they too are incapable of advancing humanity…the process of their social-engineering is complete; they are fully ready to serve the purpose we had for them…”

The Biya regime, the French-imposed system that has deprived Cameroonians of a say and a voice in charting their destiny  must desist from carrying out another election masquerade until  at least  80% of the voting age  population in all the provinces are registered, until  the process of dialogue and reconciliation  is ongoing and  until the framework of the “New Cameroon” is in place.

The vision of a “New Cameroon” that would be the nucleus of the future “United Africa” must not be allowed to be killed by those who never cherished it, for the sake of our children, for Africa and for humanity. For the "NEW CAMEROON" to be realized, the Kamerunists (union-nationalists), the country's civic-nationalists or those who cherish Cameroon or the original Cameroonian dream must step forward and start the process that would confine the Ahidjo-Biya legacies and the French-imposed system to the dustbin of history, ensure that Cameroon does not disintegrate. The process would provide the people with a federal, democratic, representative and just system that would not only ensure prosperity and dignity for all its citizens, but that would realize the objectives of reunification as espoused by those who fought, died, campaigned and voted for Cameroon's reunification and independence.

Janvier Tchouteu                                                                   April 01, 2018




 vier Tchouteu is also the author of " The Mistakes To Be Avoided in Building The New Cameroon"

Wednesday, March 28, 2018

How the French-Imposed Political Establishment in Cameroon is Propagating the word "Unionist" to Denigrate "Kamerunism" (Union-Nationalism of Cameroon)


I have seen the recent use of the adjective or noun “unionist(s)”, appearing apparently to distort the word union-nationalist that has been in existence for three decades. It is a familiar ploy of unpopular regimes or the political establishment to wrap themselves around the flag of patriotism while doing all the things that compromise Cameroon's interest to the benefit of foreign powers (their overlords) and for the handouts they get for the sellout and selloff of Cameroon, which is the case of the evil system, the Biya regime of Cameroon. The unpatriotic system France put in place in Cameroon in 1956, the Biya regime that has been managing it since 1982 and the internal and external interest groups that support it are encouraging the beneficiaries of the system that is taking Cameroon into the abyss to  use  the word  "unionists" to sound patriotic or as the ones trying to keep the country together when in reality they are the gang of looters and mercenaries for foreign powers suffocating Cameroon; when they are the spoilers who led Cameroon and triggered or opened the road to civil conflict that is haunting the country today. They are in fact the usurpers, the traitors to the genuine objectives of Cameroon’s union-nationalism (Kamerunism), which more than half a million Cameroonians died for in the Franco-Ahidjo war against the UPC and the populations supporting it in the cause for Cameroon's reunification and independence, and the KNDP/OK led campaign in the plebiscite in British Cameroons that realized the reunification of British Southern Cameroons and the former French Cameroon (called La Republique du Cameroon from 1960-1961).


Any Cameroonian who supported the UPC cause for reunification and independence/or the KNDP/OK campaign aimed at founding "The New Cameroon" should shun the word unionist and call themselves "Kamerunists" or "union-nationalists” instead, which is how most Cameroonian civic-nationalists identify themselves. Once again, unionist is a word coined by the enemies of the Cameroonian people to dilute the noble purpose of Cameroonian union-nationalism which rejects the French-imposed system, the Ahidjo/Biya regimes, the compromise of Cameroon's sovereignty and the irrational subjugation of Cameroonian interest, which the political establishment in Cameroon in place since 1956 has given away to the detriment of its citizens, and the future of Cameroon and Cameroonians.

A succinct notion of a Cameroonian union-nationalist can be grasped from the link below WHO ARE THE KAMERUNISTS (UNION NATIONALISTS OF CAMEROON )? 



Janvier Tchouteu

            

Wednesday, March 21, 2018

Democracy Ratings of Countries of the World—Full Democracy, Flawed Democracy, Hybrid Regime, Authoritarian

The Economist Intelligence Unit Democracy Index map for 2016.[1]
Bluer colours represent more democratic countries as reported by the company.



Religious Nationalism: Illiberal Democracies and the Muslim World




Democracy Index by country (2017)
Listing by country is available on The Economist website.[7]
Democracy Index 2017
Rank
Country
Score
Electoral process
and pluralism
Functioning of
government
Political
participation
Political
culture
Civil
liberties
Category
1
9.87
10.00
9.64
10.00
10.00
9.71
Full democracy
2
9.58
10.00
9.29
8.89
10.00
9.71
Full democracy
3
9.39
9.58
9.64
8.33
10.00
9.41
Full democracy
4
9.26
10.00
9.29
8.89
8.13
10.00
Full democracy
5
9.22
10.00
9.29
8.33
9.38
9.12
Full democracy
=6
9.15
9.58
7.86
8.33
10.00
10.00
Full democracy
=6
9.15
9.58
9.64
7.78
8.75
10.00
Full democracy
8
9.09
10.00
8.93
7.78
8.75
10.00
Full democracy
=9
9.03
10.00
8.93
7.78
8.75
9.71
Full democracy
=9
9.03
9.58
9.29
7.78
9.38
9.12
Full democracy
11
8.89
9.58
9.29
8.33
8.13
9.12
Full democracy
12
8.81
10.00
8.93
6.67
8.75
9.71
Full democracy
13
8.61
9.58
8.21
8.33
7.50
9.41
Full democracy
14
8.53
9.58
7.50
8.33
8.13
9.12
Full democracy
15
8.42
9.58
8.21
8.33
6.88
9.12
Full democracy
16
8.22
9.17
8.21
5.56
8.75
9.41
Full democracy
17
8.15
9.17
8.21
6.11
8.75
8.53
Full democracy
18
8.12
10.00
8.93
4.44
7.50
9.71
Full democracy
19
8.08
9.17
7.14
7.78
7.50
8.82
Full democracy
Rank
Country
Score
Electoral process
and pluralism
Functioning of
government
Political
participation
Political
culture
Civil
liberties
Category
20
8.00
9.17
7.89
7.22
7.50
8.24
Flawed democracy
=21
7.98
9.17
7.14
7.22
8.13
8.24
Flawed democracy
=21
7.98
9.58
6.43
7.22
8.13
8.53
Flawed democracy
=23
7.88
8.75
8.21
6.11
7.50
8.82
Flawed democracy
=23
7.88
9.17
7.86
6.67
6.88
9.12
Flawed democracy
=23
7.88
9.58
7.14
6.67
6.88
9.12
Flawed democracy
=26
7.84
9.58
8.57
4.44
7.50
9.12
Flawed democracy
=26
7.84
9.58
7.50
6.11
6.88
9.12
Flawed democracy
28
7.81
9.17
7.14
6.11
7.50
9.12
Flawed democracy
29
7.80
9.58
7.50
7.78
5.63
8.53
Flawed democracy
=30
7.79
9.58
7.86
6.11
6.88
8.53
Flawed democracy
=30
7.79
9.17
7.50
8.89
7.50
5.88
Flawed democracy
32
7.78
9.58
8.93
5.00
6.88
8.53
Flawed democracy
33
7.73
9.58
8.21
6.11
5.63
9.12
Flawed democracy
34
7.62
9.58
6.43
6.67
6.88
8.53
Flawed democracy
35
7.59
9.17
6.43
6.67
6.88
8.82
Flawed democracy
36
7.50
9.58
6.79
6.67
6.25
8.24
Flawed democracy
37
7.41
9.58
5.71
6.11
6.25
9.41
Flawed democracy
=38
7.29
9.58
5.36
6.11
6.88
8.53
Flawed democracy
=38
7.29
9.17
7.14
4.44
6.88
8.82
Flawed democracy
40
7.25
9.58
5.71
5.56
6.88
8.53
Flawed democracy
41
7.24
7.42
7.50
8.33
5.00
7.94
Flawed democracy
42
7.23
9.17
6.97
7.22
5.63
7.35
Flawed democracy
43
7.19
9.08
6.97
5.56
6.88
7.65
Flawed democracy
44
7.16
9.58
6.97
5.56
5.63
8.24
Flawed democracy
45
7.08
9.58
6.97
6.11
5.00
7.94
Flawed democracy
46
7.04
9.58
7.14
5.56
5.00
7.94
Flawed democracy
47
7.03
9.17
6.43
7.22
4.38
7.94
Flawed democracy
48
6.96
9.17
5.00
6.11
6.88
7.65
Flawed democracy
49
6.86
9.58
5.36
6.11
3.75
8.24
Flawed democracy
50
6.76
9.17
6.43
5.56
5.00
7.65
Flawed democracy
51
6.71
9.17
5.71
7.22
4.38
7.06
Flawed democracy
52
6.69
8.33
5.71
6.67
6.25
6.47
Flawed democracy
=53
6.67
9.17
6.07
6.11
4.38
7.65
Flawed democracy
=53
6.67
9.17
6.79
4.44
4.38
7.94
Flawed democracy
55
6.66
9.17
5.36
6.11
6.25
7.06
Flawed democracy
=56
6.64
9.17
5.00
6.67
5.63
6.76
Flawed democracy
=56
6.64
8.75
6.07
4.44
6.88
7.06
Flawed democracy
58
6.63
9.17
5.36
5.56
5.00
6.76
Flawed democracy
59
6.54
6.92
7.14
6.11
6.25
7.06
Flawed democracy
60
6.50
9.17
5.71
5.56
5.00
6.76
Flawed democracy
61
 Peru
6.49
9.17
5.36
5.56
5.00
7.35
Flawed democracy
62
6.48
7.83
7.14
5.00
6.25
6.18
Flawed democracy
63
6.46
8.75
5.71
6.11
4.38
7.35
Flawed democracy
64
6.44
9.17
5.71
5.00
4.38
7.94
Flawed democracy
65
6.43
9.17
5.36
4.44
5.00
7.06
Flawed democracy
=66
6.41
8.25
5.36
6.67
5.00
7.35
Flawed democracy
=66
6.41
7.83
6.43
7.22
4.38
6.18
Flawed democracy
68
6.39
6.92
7.14
6.67
5.63
5.59
Flawed democracy
=69
6.32
6.00
5.71
7.78
6.25
5.88
Flawed democracy
=69
6.32
4.33
7.86
6.11
6.25
7.06
Flawed democracy
=71
6.31
3.92
6.07
5.56
7.50
8.53
Flawed democracy
=71
6.31
5.67
5.36
6.67
5.63
8.24
Flawed democracy
=71
6.31
8.75
6.07
5.00
4.38
7.35
Flawed democracy
74
6.15
7.50
6.07
4.44
6.25
6.47
Flawed democracy
75
6.03
6.92
6.07
3.89
5.63
7.65
Flawed democracy
76
6.02
8.75
4.64
5.56
4.38
6.76
Flawed democracy
Rank
Country
Score
Electoral process
and pluralism
Functioning of
government
Political
participation
Political
culture
Civil
liberties
Category
77
5.98
7.00
4.71
5.56
5.00
7.65
Hybrid regime
78
5.94
7.50
4.64
6.11
4.38
7.06
Hybrid regime
79
5.93
8.67
4.29
6.11
5.00
5.59
Hybrid regime
80
5.86
7.92
5.71
3.89
5.00
6.76
Hybrid regime
81
 Fiji
5.85
6.58
5.36
6.11
5.63
5.59
Hybrid regime
82
5.72
8.25
5.36
4.44
4.38
6.18
Hybrid regime
=83
5.69
6.17
3.21
6.67
6.25
6.18
Hybrid regime
=83
5.69
6.08
5.36
5.56
4.38
7.06
Hybrid regime
85
5.68
6.17
5.00
3.89
6.88
6.47
Hybrid regime
86
 Mali
5.64
7.42
3.93
4.44
6.25
6.18
Hybrid regime
87
5.61
6.50
5.36
5.00
5.63
5.59
Hybrid regime
88
5.57
6.50
5.00
5.56
3.75
7.06
Hybrid regime
=89
5.49
7.00
4.64
5.00
3.75
7.06
Hybrid regime
=89
5.49
6.58
4.29
4.44
6.25
5.88
Hybrid regime
91
5.47
7.00
5.00
5.00
5.63
4.71
Hybrid regime
92
5.43
7.42
5.07
5.00
4.38
5.29
Hybrid regime
93
5.23
7.42
2.57
5.56
5.00
5.59
Hybrid regime
94
   Nepal
5.18
4.33
5.36
5.00
5.63
5.59
Hybrid regime
=95
5.11
3.50
5.36
6.67
5.63
4.41
Hybrid regime
=95
5.11
6.58
2.93
6.67
4.38
5.00
Hybrid regime
=95
5.11
6.08
3.57
5.56
5.63
4.71
Hybrid regime
98
5.09
5.25
3.57
3.89
6.88
5.88
Hybrid regime
99
5.08
8.33
6.07
2.78
4.38
3.82
Hybrid regime
100
4.88
5.33
6.07
5.00
5.63
2.35
Hybrid regime
=101
4.87
5.25
4.64
4.44
5.63
4.41
Hybrid regime
=101
4.87
6.50
2.93
5.00
3.75
6.18
Hybrid regime
103
4.75
4.42
4.29
4.44
5.63
5.00
Hybrid regime
104
4.72
3.50
2.57
7.22
5.63
4.71
Hybrid regime
=105
4.66
6.58
1.86
3.33
6.25
5.29
Hybrid regime
=105
4.66
3.42
3.29
3.89
5.63
7.06
Hybrid regime
107
4.63
3.00
4.29
5.00
5.00
5.88
Hybrid regime
108
4.46
3.83
2.50
7.78
4.38
3.82
Hybrid regime
109
4.44
6.08
4.64
3.33
3.75
4.41
Hybrid regime
110
4.26
6.50
5.36
2.22
2.50
4.71
Hybrid regime
111
4.11
5.25
2.86
5.00
1.88
5.59
Hybrid regime
112
 Iraq
4.09
4.33
0.07
7.22
5.00
3.82
Hybrid regime
113
4.06
4.48
3.93
3.33
5.63
2.94
Hybrid regime
114
4.03
5.17
2.21
2.22
4.38
6.18
Hybrid regime
115
4.02
4.42
2.14
5.00
5.00
3.53
Hybrid regime
Rank
Country
Score
Electoral process
and pluralism
Functioning of
government
Political
participation
Political
culture
Civil
liberties
Category
116
3.93
4.42
2.14
3.33
5.63
4.12
Authoritarian
=117
3.87
3.58
4.29
3.89
4.38
3.24
Authoritarian
=117
3.87
2.17
2.86
6.11
4.38
3.82
Authoritarian
119
3.85
3.17
4.29
3.89
4.38
3.53
Authoritarian
120
3.83
3.67
3.93
3.89
5.63
2.06
Authoritarian
121
3.82
3.00
3.57
5.00
3.13
4.41
Authoritarian
122
3.76
5.25
1.14
3.33
4.38
4.71
Authoritarian
123
3.71
4.33
2.21
4.44
3.75
3.82
Authoritarian
124
3.63
1.33
5.71
2.22
5.63
3.24
Authoritarian
125
3.62
1.75
2.86
5.56
5.00
2.94
Authoritarian
=126
3.61
2.58
2.21
4.44
5.00
3.82
Authoritarian
=126
3.61
4.00
2.86
3.89
4.38
2.94
Authoritarian
128
3.56
2.58
2.21
3.89
5.00
4.12
Authoritarian
129
3.42
0.00
3.57
5.56
5.63
2.35
Authoritarian
130
3.36
3.58
3.21
3.33
3.75
2.94
Authoritarian
131
 Cuba
3.31
1.33
4.29
3.89
4.38
2.65
Authoritarian
132
3.25
3.17
2.50
3.89
3.75
2.94
Authoritarian
=133
3.19
0.00
4.29
2.22
5.63
3.82
Authoritarian
=133
3.19
0.83
5.00
2.78
4.38
2.94
Authoritarian
135
3.17
2.17
1.79
5.00
2.50
4.41
Authoritarian
136
3.16
0.50
2.00
4.44
5.63
3.24
Authoritarian
137
3.14
3.50
0.43
4.44
4.38
2.94
Authoritarian
138
3.13
0.92
2.86
3.89
5.63
2.35
Authoritarian
139
3.10
0.00
5.00
2.78
6.25
1.47
Authoritarian
140
3.08
0.00
3.21
3.89
5.63
2.65
Authoritarian
141
3.06
0.50
2.14
4.44
4.38
3.82
Authoritarian
142
 Togo
3.05
3.17
0.79
2.78
5.00
3.53
Authoritarian
143
 Oman
3.04
0.00
3.93
2.78
4.38
4.12
Authoritarian
144
3.03
0.92
2.86
2.22
5.63
3.53
Authoritarian
145
2.76
0.42
1.79
3.33
5.63
2.65
Authoritarian
146
2.71
0.83
3.21
2.78
4.38
2.35
Authoritarian
147
2.69
0.00
3.57
2.22
5.00
2.65
Authoritarian
148
2.65
0.50
2.14
3.33
3.75
3.53
Authoritarian
149
2.55
2.50
1.14
2.78
2.50
3.82
Authoritarian
150
 Iran
2.45
0.00
3.21
4.44
3.13
1.47
Authoritarian
=151
2.37
0.00
2.14
1.67
6.88
1.18
Authoritarian
=151
 Laos
2.37
0.83
2.86
1.67
5.00
1.47
Authoritarian
153
2.33
0.00
0.43
3.89
5.00
2.35
Authoritarian
154
2.32
1.00
0.36
1.67
5.63
2.94
Authoritarian
155
2.15
0.00
1.79
2.78
5.00
1.18
Authoritarian
156
2.07
0.00
0.00
4.44
5.00
0.88
Authoritarian
157
1.98
1.67
0.00
2.78
3.13
2.35
Authoritarian
158
1.95
0.08
1.86
2.22
5.00
0.59
Authoritarian
=159
1.93
0.00
2.86
2.22
3.13
1.47
Authoritarian
=159
1.93
0.08
0.79
1.67
6.25
0.88
Authoritarian
161
1.81
0.00
0.43
2.78
4.38
1.47
Authoritarian
162
1.72
0.00
0.79
2.22
5.00
0.59
Authoritarian
163
1.61
0.50
0.71
2.22
3.75
0.88
Authoritarian
164
1.52
2.25
0.00
1.11
1.88
2.35
Authoritarian
165
 Chad
1.50
0.00
0.00
1.11
3.75
2.65
Authoritarian
166
1.43
0.00
0.00
2.78
4.38
0.00
Authoritarian
167
1.08
0.00
2.50
1.67
1.25
0.00
Authoritarian
Rank
Country
Score
Electoral process
and pluralism
Functioning of
government
Political
participation
Political
culture
Civil
liberties
Category
Changes from 2010 onwards