Thursday, January 30, 2025

TRUMP, RUSSIA, UKRAINE, AND THE MILLENNIAL WAR ON RUS : And The Path to a New Ukraine

 

Introduction



A war rages in Europe between two East Slavic nations who centuries ago spoke the same language, who for centuries occupied a single geopolitical space called Kievan Rus, but who became separated by history (Mongol invasion, Mongol-Tatar yoke, Occupation by the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, and subjugation by the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth) long enough for separate identities to emerge among these East Slavic peoples otherwise called the people of the former Kievan Rus, as they came to identify themselves in the modern era as Byelorussians, Russians, Rusyns, and Ukrainians.


The reunification of the East Slavs through diplomacy (The 1654 Treaty of Pereyaslav where the Zaporozhian Cossacks pledged their allegiance to the Russian Czar, thereby bringing together Russia and much of Eastern Ukraine and a substantial part of Central Ukraine) and war (the victories of the Russian Empire over the Crimean Khanate, the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, Kingdom of Sweden, and recently Nazi Germany, thereby recovering more former lands of Kievan Rus that constitute parts of eastern, southern, central, and western Ukraine, as well as Belarus today), did not bring them together forever, as the leaders of the three East Slavic nations (Russia, Belarus, and Ukraine) decided to bring an end to the USSR (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics), the successor of the Russian Empire, and the country that they were constituent republics of, together with twelve other non-Slavic states or republics. Their amicable dissolution of the USSR in 1991 was supposed to lead to better relations between the supposedly three brotherly East-Slavic states where populations of Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians formed substantial minorities in each of the countries.


But all did not go as well as the majority of different East Slav populations had anticipated back in 1991. They became the victims of Divide-and-rule, and Ukraine, with its evenly divided population of native Russian speakers who are pro-Russian and native Ukrainian speakers who are pro-West, and a large proportion of ethnic minorities of mostly ethnic Russians and Belarusians, became the arena for those forces bent on separating the East Slavs forever, using the many schisms in Ukrainian society.


Many unbiased critical analysts hold that the schisms in themselves could not have led to the current Ukrainian conflict, which became an armed conflict between a new regime in Kyiv of mostly native Ukrainian-speakers that came to power through a coup, and the people of the Donbas who rejected the new pro-Western regime that overthrew their democratically-elected but flawed native son. These analysts hold that it was outside support from the West to the anti-Russian forces, based on a game plan to bring resources rich and strategically-located Ukraine to the Western orbit that caused the start of the Donbas War (otherwise called Ukrainian Civil war) in 2014.


The civil war in Ukraine lasted for eight years until the Russo-Ukrainian War subsumed it when Russia openly intervened by invading Ukraine on February 24, 2022, occupied a quarter of Ukraine, and asked for peace talks days after, claiming that it sent its troops in to bring an end to the Ukrainian Civil War. The Peace Agreement that would have brought an end to the war in early 2022 was never signed as Ukraine's Western patrons convinced the Ukrainian leadership to abandon the deal, promising them weapons and other support that would help Ukraine defeat Russia. It is almost three years now and the war is ongoing, with close to a million casualties and Ukraine losing ground.


Donald Trump, the 45th president of the United States of America ran his campaign to become the 47th US. President promising to bring an end to the Ukraine Conflict. How is that possible? On what grounds would his initiative be based on? Would his calculations be based more on American interest, the collective Ukrainian interest, the interest of the East Slavs, the interest of humanity or a combination of most or all of those interests?


It is against this backdrop of conflicting narratives, contradictory interests, muddled intentions, solemn dreams, and broken promises that we are presented with this humble but insightful fact-based account that is educative in a peculiar way. This book is an eye-opening and fascinating journey involving research and analysis of a complex problem blighting the European landscape, a crisis in itself that risks plunging the world into World War Three and Nuclear Armageddon.











Saturday, January 25, 2025

A Tale of Two Dictators? (Paul Biya of Cameroon & Alexander Lukashenko of Belarus)

Curiously, when it comes to the issue of dictators strutting this globe, the old media of the Western world, otherwise called the traditional or legacy media, puts the focus on Alexander Lukashenko of Belarus who has been in power for thirty years and is seeking reelection, holding that he is "Europe's Last Dictator"; while ignoring Paul Biya of Cameroon---Africa's absentee president who has been in power for 42 years, who has made Cameroon the most mismanaged country in the world; and while Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo of Equatorial Guinea has been the head of state of that small oil-rich Spanish-speaking  country in the center of Africa for 45-years.


The dictatorial Lukashenko is against the infringement of Belarusian sovereignty by the West and is friendly with Russia, while the two African dictators are compradors of the West, lackeys of  France and the globalist agenda that stifles Africa's development, making it a supplier of raw materials bought at far below market prices, with the dictators and their cronies and retinues pocketing a huge chunk of the money from the undersold resources, with most of the money laundered by their backers to their bank accounts in Western countries.


While Lukashenko has always been popular with his people despite his dictatorial tendencies, Paul Biya of Cameroon has never won the hearts of Cameroonians, maintaining his stay in power by an efficient rigging machinery that keeps more than three-quarters of the population unregistered, but whose electoral fraud is always validated by his Western backers, and the Mainstream Media in the West, thus squashing any hope of a popular uprising.








The Union Moujik


FALLEN HEROES: African Leaders Whose Assassinations Disarrayed the Continent and Benefitted Foreign Interests






Thursday, January 23, 2025

L'Idée Kamerunienne et l'Idéal Kamerunien en bref


En un mot, il s'agit d'une forme unique de nationalisme civique qui implique tous ceux qui souscrivent à l'idée kamerunienne conçue dans les années 1940, prônant la réunification des territoires de l'ancien Kamerun allemand (Cameroun britannique et Cameroun français), leur indépendance conjointe et la mise en œuvre de l'idéal kamerunien d'un État-nation égalitaire.  Les citoyens titulaires de droits qui, indépendamment de leur appartenance ethnique, de leur race, de leur couleur, de leur religion, de leur sexe ou de leur langue, sont :

Unis dans leur attachement patriotique à la terre

Partager les valeurs de démocratie, de liberté, de tolérance et de progrès

Et qui respectent leurs droits à l'autonomie gouvernementale, les traditions et les cultures de la terre, ainsi que la liberté de la terre de déterminer son destin en harmonie avec les forces progressistes et humaines du monde.




In a nutshell, it is a unique form of civic nationalism which involves all those who subscribe to the Kamerunian Idea conceived in the 1940s, advocating for the reunification of the territories of the former German Kamerun (British Cameroons and French Cameroon), their joint independence and the implementation of the Kamerunian Ideal of a nation-state of equal, rights-bearing citizens who regardless of their ethnicity, race, color, religion, gender or language are:

United in their patriotic attachment to the land

Share values of democracy, liberty, tolerance and progress

And who respect their self-governing rights, the traditions and cultures of the land, and the land’s freedom to determine its destiny in harmony with the progressive and humane forces of the world.




Le 2 Septembre, 2018


Le Titres de Janvier Tchouteu





L’ÉCLAIR DU SOLEIL (Série Compradors) (French Edition)